Friday, April 30, 2010
Concept of Capacity Index
The notional variable charge for the hydro generating station is the average least variable cost of the thermal generating stations in the region. This facilitates full despatch of hydro generating stations in merit order.
Under the current tariff system, actual operation of the plant is necessary to recover a capacity charge, whereas under the previous tariff, availability of capacity was used to determine the capacity charge. This meant that, under the previous system, the capacity charge recovered by a power generating station was tied to the amount of capacity available rather than based on the
actual operation of the plant. As such, even if there was insufficient water to enable a power station to operate at maximum capacity, the power station could still recover a capacity charge commensurate with the amount of energy that it would have been able to generate through operation had there been a sufficient water supply.
With NAPAF being used to determine the capacity charge under the current system, availability of capacity will no longer have the same impact on capacity charge. Instead, actual production will affect the capacity charge.
The Commission has decided to implement the concept of Capacity Index in place of 'Availability'. The basic criteria for Capacity index are :
a) Water spillage must be minimized
b) As far as possible, the peak capAvailability of a hydro station for any period shall be based on the
Capacity Index (CI) declared for the day. It is defined as follows :
Declared Capacity (MW)
Capacity Index = ------------------------------------------------ x 100
Maximum Available Capacity (MW)acity of each plant must be available when most required by the system.
http://cercind.gov.in/2612/operational.pdf
Thursday, April 15, 2010
LNG Vs RIL - A good article
Poor infrastructure -- that bane of existence for most Indians and perpetually the weakest link in the country's chain of progress and development -- looks all set to also cut short its honeymoon with natural gas.
While the past year has been kind to the country's gas consumers, thanks to major new pipeline flows from Reliance's D6 block at agreeable rates and spot LNG prices falling back to the ground from their brief perch above $20/MMBtu in the winter of 2008/2009, disaster might be lurking just round the corner.
Sure, some new transmission capacity will come up in 2011 with the addition of compressors and a parallel pipeline along the Hazira-Vijaipur-Jagdishpur arterial route serving the west and the north, but all of that is expected to be swallowed up by incremental flows from D6.
And sure, there is lots of new transmission capacity planned with billions of dollars in investment over the coming years. But nobody is holding his breath for it, what with the lack of clear policy on a national gas grid, in addition to regulatory opacity and financing hurdles.
D6 output, currently restricted to around 60 million cu m/day, is only waiting for next year's transmission capacity creep to leap to 90 or even 120 million cu m/day, according to sources. Yes, that's far higher than the 80 million cu m/day "peak" rate Reliance has been talking about.
There is talk of a game plan by the producer to flood and capture the market with its gas, even if that means a reduced plateau period and faster reservoir depletion. The government mandating fertilizer producers to move away from imported LNG to D6 gas helps, no doubt.
News reports mid-March of India courting its old friend Qatar and asking for up to 4 million mt/year of additional term supplies by 2013 over the current 7.5 million mt/year look very well on paper. The reality on the ground is there will be no pipeline capacity to evacuate that amount of gas.
Certainly not if Reliance gas continues to be available until 2014 for under $7/MMBtu at customer gate. Can term LNG, benchmarked to world crude prices, compete with freight, import taxes and regas costs stacked on?
No matter how much surplus Qatar has. Will it sell term cargoes at $5/MMBtu FOB to enable importers to compete with D6, notwithstanding the songs of friendship sung during oil minister Attiyah's March visit to India?
Probably not. So here's what we might see 5-6 years down the line: D6 is exhausted, there are no major new domestic gas sources on the horizon, the country's LNG importers have been all but snuffed out, and new import terminal projects have fallen by the wayside. Worse, world oil and gas markets have resumed their ascent to historic highs, while India is still struggling to accept market pricing for gas. Scary. And potentially disastrous.
The author is Asia News Director – Oil & Gas, Platts, a McGraw-Hill company.
Vandana Hari article from Business standard
Monday, March 29, 2010
Punj Llyod exits Pipavav shipyard
"Interestingly, Punj is exiting at a price (Rs 50) lower than the IPO price of Rs 58. Yet it is also making a huge profit as it invested at Rs 27 a share, a merchant banker said. Punj shares closed at Rs 178.05 on the BSE, down by 3.86 per cent."
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Thursday, March 25, 2010
LNG
PLL and Ras gas have agreed upon a PSM, which envisages that the payments received from the offtakers would be divided into two accounts
· Fuel payment trust and retention account (FPTRA)
· Subaccount1: LNG charge account
· Subaccount2: Charter hire account
· PLL onshore trust and retention account (POTRA)
· Make statuary payments
· Meet o&M expenses
· Residual amount to be transferred to debt service account
· Residual cash would be available for appropriation.
With capacity utilisation of PLL’s plant being low in 2004-05, it could not absorb the high fixed costs of interest, depreciation and O&M, and posted a book loss. In 2005-06 however, as capacity utilisation improved, the company’s contribution, operating profit and net profit showed a significant improvement; this continues in the current fiscal. At its existing plant, PLL has a cushion to go up to an output of 6.3 MMTPA, considering its available regassification capacity (22.5 MMSCMD). To utilise its spare capacity, PLL has made its plant available on a tolling basis to offtakers for regassifying the LNG bought on the spot market. During the first quarter of 2006- 07, PLL handled one shipload of spot LNG, and subsequently, it has handled two more shiploads. The company earns regassification revenues of around Rs. 83.5 million for every shipload of spot LNG of volume 1,35,000 m3, which directly adds toThe company is in talks with Qatar, Oman, Egypt, Malaysia, Australia and Abu Dhabi in the United
Arab Emirates (UAE) for spot purchases its bottomline as the variable costs for tolling are negligible and the fixed costs are recovered through the existing regassification charges for 5mtpa
'The success in selling the entire stock of the first spot cargo bought by the company from Algeria has given us the confidence to go ahead with plans to purchase more spot cargoes of LNG,'company sources told IANS
Normally, countries inform one month in advance if any LNG cargo of three trillion British thermal unit (Btu), or equivalent of 80 million standard cubic metre (MMSCM) of natural gas, is likely to become available. On the basis of competitive bids, the spot cargo is sold.
East Coast: Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia
Middle East is the preferred supply centre on the West Coast due to:
- Large gas reserves
- Transportation advantage
- Existing markets
- Pipeline and marketing infrastructure
- Expansion potential

